How h4831sc load data can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.
How h4831sc load data can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.
Blog Article
I'm an actual admirer on the H4831 powder. I get excellent velocity and precision out of any caliber I've tried out it in. With the 25-06 up towards the 338 it's my drop by powder of decision. I try every kind of powders when Operating up loads, however the H4831 often appears to appear out on prime for precision and velocity when the situation is of the 06 course or more substantial.
They have executed identically for me. Like Absolutely everyone else I rushed to have the newer SC Variation but have now switched back again. Ideally you need about 100% loading density. For those who have sufficient circumstance ability for that H4831(long) you happen to be probably far better off.
The obvious cause is usually a rough/ruff bore. No amount of copper fouling cutting down brokers inside the powder will probably right this.
Warning making use of SC or SSC created loads with extensive Reduce, again off and get the job done up. Use Secure loading procedures.
The only variation as I understand it is that the SC was intended to perform through powder measures superior (which it does). The longer grains tend not to feed very well in any respect in a few steps. Thats my 02 :grin:
Because there would not appear to be any "official" Load Data available for this Load, can a number of you present a place to begin with this mix and matters to consider when working this Load up?
If there isn't a load data it's due to the fact h4831 vs h4831sc this powder is not really suitable for this cartridge. Typically one particular will likely not find 1 powder to fit all cartridges, as well as the relatives of cartridges with The actual powder h4831sc (4831SC) that you're asking about doesn't perform.
excaliber explained: I've uncovered the exact reverse to get accurate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and Similarly correct powder in my 300 Gain Mag.
I've located the precise opposite being genuine in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and equally precise powder in my 300 Win Mag.
Ballistically, this Extreme Extruded powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it has a shorter grain dimension, hence, the designation SC or short Lower. The shorter, far more compact kernels enable the powder to move through the powder actions much more smoothly, helping to ease the continuous slicing of granules.
Kansas Metropolis, MO I might get no matter what is obtainable at the moment. I’ve employed the two even though with my visit load and didn’t see something various overall performance wise.
It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Observed a node and shot some teams. I shot a .six five shot group these days. It is just a little slower than H1000, but shoots excellent. Thanks for the advice, it's good to know that I have obtained selections when just one or the opposite powder is dried up.
Can I believe that H4831 may be substituted for h4831sc load data H4831sc ? I am aware the physical variance but will it impact the burn up or velocity? I do think not but I am not one hundred% guaranteed.
I found that my 7mag 160 partitions ended up sub MOA with 4831sc with reduced to min prices. I’m talking 2700 (probably 2800) fps, it absolutely was a lower 60s grain demand in a very Norma situation. Not what I had been seeking, but exact Nevertheless.