Detailed Notes on h4831sc load data
Detailed Notes on h4831sc load data
Blog Article
Given that there isn't going to look like any "official" Load Data around for this Load, can some of you give a starting point with this mix and things to consider when working this Load up?
I have utilized H4831 (and H4831SC), And that i utilize it. There aren't lots of cartridges that I utilize it for as I look always to gravitate to other powders. Nonetheless, I am unable to express that it does not do the job. It is just that A few other powders do the job far better for just a presented cartridge. For example, from the 280, H4831 gave me fantastic velocity and very fantastic teams with Nosler a hundred and forty AB. Even so, RL19 was marginally improved in precision, though the velocity was almost equivalent.
The truth that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is specifically why you are observing larger velocities obtained with that powder, in contrast to That which you've noticed with the IMR things. Also fantastic powder, but fairly much better suited to a little bit more compact cases that has a little bit significantly less potential.
That means the knowledgable handloader can, with some extrapolation, discover a starting off load when just one is outlined for a specific cartridge.
The only difference as I understand it would be that the SC was built to operate by way of powder measures better (which it does). The for a longer period grains don't feed well in the slightest degree in a few measures. Thats my 02 :grin:
I've utilised H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem with no change. The only thing may be the short Slice offers you a little bit more Area. Superior luck!gun)
i've utilized equally and applied the very same prices and possess not been ready to tell any noticable variations with efficiency. the SC Edition meters just a little smoother is about all. any responses??
The SC or SSC specified powders Typically allow for for better load density, in order to generally get a tiny bit much more powder in a very supplied circumstance when using compressed loads. Usage of a drop tube can additional maximize this edge.
dioni.a.312 explained: In my working experience the only actual variance would be that the shortcut meters better by means of reloading products. The moment it's loaded theres no functional change. I have read which the shortcut can have a very small little bit faster h4831 vs h4831sc burn level but it seems insignificant. Click to develop...
It can be humorous how over time loading plenty of various cartridges in a number of rifles which i have not obtained suitable end success with H-4831 or perhaps the quick-Slice Model.
If there's no load data it really is simply because this powder isn't suitable for this cartridge. Ordinarily just one will not obtain one particular powder to fit all cartridges, as well as relatives of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you'll be asking about does not do the job. Click on to expand...
Like everyone mentioned, the SC means “brief Slice” and is a little bit much easier to meter. Tends to make you problem why they might nevertheless make the frequent 1.
I frequently always have the h4831 vs h4831sc sc version. Employing a powder evaluate it hangs up fewer as a consequence of shorter kernels and I think lets additional regular metering so considerably less time you are taking trickling in the last little bit of demand for making fat. So fundamentally the SC will h4831 vs h4831sc save you moments
If I've a pound or two of the powder and get much more of the same, only a unique good deal selection, I'll mix them all up so that I have a homogeneous batch of powder with which to operate.